Back to portfolio
CreativeSimulated project

Brand Designer portfolio brief

A simulated creative exercise for Brand Designer. Treat it as realistic practice, not real client or protocol work.

Objective

Audit a Web3 brand across product and marketing

Expected deliverables

Brand systemKey visualCampaign toolkitTemplate libraryPartner kitArt-direction briefBrand QA note

Recommended workflow

  1. Audit a Web3 brand across product and marketing
  2. Build a small identity and template system
  3. Show how it handles three different campaigns
  4. Review the result against the rubric, then package it as a case study.

Constraints and safety

  • Use only public sources or clearly simulated data.
  • Never include seed phrases, private keys, or wallet secrets.
  • Redact private user, company, security, legal, or compensation information.
  • State every assumption you make.

Tools in practice

Figma
Build campaign layouts, brand templates, and production-ready assets while protecting hierarchy and consistency.
Adobe tools or equivalents
Create vector, image, layout, and production files for identity systems, campaigns, events, and partner deliverables.
asset management
Store approved files, versions, usage rights, and exports so teams can find the correct asset without overwriting source work.
presentation tools
Turn the analysis behind brand system and key visual into a reviewable decision narrative for internal or external stakeholders.
collaboration and review tools
Collect precise feedback on hierarchy, brand consistency, rights, copy accuracy, and production readiness without overwriting source files.

What a strong submission shows

  • A brand system across several surfaces
  • A launch campaign
  • A scalable template set
  • A brand audit with recommendations

Weak submission patterns

  • One hero image presented as a system
  • Moodboards without execution
  • Crypto clichés used without strategic reason

Review rubric

  • Accuracy of claims and sources
  • Relevance to the target role
  • Decision quality and trade-offs
  • Completeness of the deliverable
  • Clarity of communication
  • Honest limitations and next steps

Present it as a case study

  • Explain the problem, sources, decisions, ownership, constraints, output, review, and what you would change.
  • Show the final artifact before the process notes.
  • State what you owned and what belonged to other people.
  • Label the work as simulated, and keep any real contribution clearly separate.

Interview questions this project helps you answer

  1. How do you turn positioning into a repeatable visual system?

  2. What should remain fixed and what can flex across campaigns?

  3. How do you judge whether a template system is helping or flattening the work?

Turn this into an application