Back to portfolio
Technical & SecuritySimulated project
Developer Relations portfolio brief
A simulated technical & security exercise for Developer Relations. Treat it as realistic practice, not real client or protocol work.
7 deliverables6 tools referenced3 linked interview questions
Objective
Build a reproducible example
Expected deliverables
QuickstartSample applicationWorkshop deckTechnical articleFAQ or support noteDeveloper feedback reportHackathon brief
Recommended workflow
- Build a reproducible example
- Teach it in a short workshop
- Document the questions and product changes that emerged
- Review the result against the rubric, then package it as a case study.
Constraints and safety
- Use only public sources or clearly simulated data.
- Never include seed phrases, private keys, or wallet secrets.
- Redact private user, company, security, legal, or compensation information.
- State every assumption you make.
Tools in practice
- GitHub
- Read code and issues, test examples, review documentation changes, and keep docs aligned with released software.
- Docs
- Draft, review, and maintain quickstart and sample application, with owners, source links, and change history.
- Discord
- Answer integration questions, host technical office hours, and turn repeated developer blockers into docs or examples.
- CodeSandbox or StackBlitz
- Publish runnable integrations that let developers test wallet, API, or contract flows without setting up a full local environment.
- analytics
- Measure the role-specific signals behind quickstart and sample application and document attribution, time window, and known gaps.
- event and livestream tools
- Run workshops, demos, livestreams, and office hours, then capture questions that should become examples or documentation.
What a strong submission shows
- A tested quickstart
- A sample integration
- A workshop recording
- A developer-friction report tied to product changes
Weak submission patterns
- Conference photos with no technical substance
- Content that cannot be reproduced
- Advocacy that hides product limitations
Review rubric
- Accuracy of claims and sources
- Relevance to the target role
- Decision quality and trade-offs
- Completeness of the deliverable
- Clarity of communication
- Honest limitations and next steps
Present it as a case study
- Explain the problem, sources, decisions, ownership, constraints, output, review, and what you would change.
- Show the final artifact before the process notes.
- State what you owned and what belonged to other people.
- Label the work as simulated, and keep any real contribution clearly separate.
Interview questions this project helps you answer
How would you reduce time to first successful integration?
What do you do when the official example no longer works?
How do you measure DevRel without using event attendance as the whole answer?