Back to portfolio
Governance, Legal & PeopleSimulated project
Web3 Educator / Curriculum Builder portfolio brief
A simulated governance, legal & people exercise for Web3 Educator / Curriculum Builder. Treat it as realistic practice, not real client or protocol work.
7 deliverables6 tools referenced3 linked interview questions
Objective
Choose the developer or user track
Expected deliverables
Curriculum mapLessonWorkshopExerciseAssessment rubricFacilitator guideLearner feedback report
Recommended workflow
- Choose the developer or user track
- Define one real learner task and prerequisites
- Build, test, and revise a short lesson with evidence of learning
- Review the result against the rubric, then package it as a case study.
Constraints and safety
- Use only public sources or clearly simulated data.
- Never include seed phrases, private keys, or wallet secrets.
- Redact private user, company, security, legal, or compensation information.
- State every assumption you make.
Tools in practice
- Docs or LMS
- Draft, review, and maintain curriculum map and lesson, with owners, source links, and change history.
- GitHub and sandboxes for developer track
- Inspect technical source material and maintain versioned work connected to curriculum map and lesson.
- presentation tools
- Turn the analysis behind curriculum map and lesson into a reviewable decision narrative for internal or external stakeholders.
- forms and assessment tools
- Create diagnostic questions, exercises, assessments, and learner feedback forms tied to specific learning objectives.
- analytics
- Measure the role-specific signals behind curriculum map and lesson and document attribution, time window, and known gaps.
- community platforms
- Run cohort discussion, answer learner questions, collect misconceptions, and route technical corrections to subject-matter reviewers.
What a strong submission shows
- A curriculum map
- One complete lesson and exercise
- An assessment rubric
- A revision based on learner errors
Weak submission patterns
- Slide decks with no learning objective
- Content consumption counted as mastery
- Developer tutorials that have not been run
Review rubric
- Accuracy of claims and sources
- Relevance to the target role
- Decision quality and trade-offs
- Completeness of the deliverable
- Clarity of communication
- Honest limitations and next steps
Present it as a case study
- Explain the problem, sources, decisions, ownership, constraints, output, review, and what you would change.
- Show the final artifact before the process notes.
- State what you owned and what belonged to other people.
- Label the work as simulated, and keep any real contribution clearly separate.
Interview questions this project helps you answer
How do the two education tracks differ in technical hiring requirements?
How do you assess whether someone can actually perform the task?
What do you remove when a lesson is accurate but overloaded?
Turn this into an application
Practice interviewsRehearse the Web3 Educator / Curriculum Builder questions above with the answer framework.Package and applyUse the Get Hired journey to turn this brief into a case study and targeted application.Related role guideSee the full Web3 Educator / Curriculum Builder scope, proof standards, and boundaries.