Back to portfolio
Governance, Legal & PeopleSimulated project

Web3 HR / Talent Acquisition portfolio brief

A simulated governance, legal & people exercise for Web3 HR / Talent Acquisition. Treat it as realistic practice, not real client or protocol work.

Objective

Choose one role and build a scorecard

Expected deliverables

Role scorecardSourcing planInterview rubricCandidate communicationOffer and onboarding checklistHiring funnel report

Recommended workflow

  1. Choose one role and build a scorecard
  2. Write a structured interview loop
  3. Audit a public job description for vague or contradictory requirements
  4. Review the result against the rubric, then package it as a case study.

Constraints and safety

  • Use only public sources or clearly simulated data.
  • Never include seed phrases, private keys, or wallet secrets.
  • Redact private user, company, security, legal, or compensation information.
  • State every assumption you make.

Tools in practice

ATS such as Greenhouse
Move candidates through structured stages, preserve scorecards, and keep interview feedback tied to approved criteria.
LinkedIn
Research candidates, test sourcing assumptions, and document why a profile matches the approved role scorecard.
Notion
Draft, review, and maintain role scorecard and sourcing plan, with owners, source links, and change history.
Airtable
Track candidates, scorecards, interview stages, feedback, and offer status without losing decision ownership.
scheduling tools
Distribute approved work and review channel-specific performance with attribution limits.
compensation and HR systems
Maintain approved level, location, offer, policy, and people records with the required access controls.

What a strong submission shows

  • A role scorecard
  • A structured interview loop
  • A candidate communication set
  • An onboarding plan

Weak submission patterns

  • Follower-based candidate rankings
  • Generic culture questions
  • Funnel dashboards that ignore role difficulty or hiring quality

Review rubric

  • Accuracy of claims and sources
  • Relevance to the target role
  • Decision quality and trade-offs
  • Completeness of the deliverable
  • Clarity of communication
  • Honest limitations and next steps

Present it as a case study

  • Explain the problem, sources, decisions, ownership, constraints, output, review, and what you would change.
  • Show the final artifact before the process notes.
  • State what you owned and what belonged to other people.
  • Label the work as simulated, and keep any real contribution clearly separate.

Interview questions this project helps you answer

  1. How do you assess a contributor whose public proof is strong but formal experience is limited?

  2. What makes an interview question job-relevant?

  3. How would you prevent a hiring manager from moving the goalposts mid-process?

Turn this into an application